firecat: gorilla with arms folded looking stern (unamused)
[personal profile] firecat
I just tried signing up again for Second Life. The first time, quite a while back, I gave up early in the process because I couldn't find a "last name" that I liked among the offered choices. Today I got farther into the form, but I ended up not signing up, because the form required me to specify a gender.

Why the fuck does SL care about my gender identity???

Date: 5 August 2008 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinboy.livejournal.com
So they can target ads at you?

Date: 5 August 2008 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liveavatar.livejournal.com
Ask [livejournal.com profile] whumpdotcom that question; he works there.

Date: 5 August 2008 03:16 am (UTC)
ext_6279: (Default)
From: [identity profile] submarine-bells.livejournal.com
It's a starting point for building an avatar. You can change just about anything later on, including making the avatar look completely neuter (or nonhuman, or whatever), but you gotta start somewhere. Also, there are some built-in default animations (which can be overridden later) that vary by gender - walk, sit pose, that sort of thing. You can change the sex of your avatar any time you like, using the same tools that you use to modify its other physical attributes. So it's not immutable in any way, it's just a point to start from.

Date: 5 August 2008 03:38 am (UTC)
ext_6279: (Default)
From: [identity profile] submarine-bells.livejournal.com
Yeah, it'd be nice if the underlying engine could cope with "none of the above", but given that all of the default gender signifiers are mutable once you're actually in-world, I've not found it to be a real hassle in practice. And yes, I'm pretty obligatory-gender-enforcement-averse myself - initially when I signed up I was a bit concerned that I might wind up having to be more gendered in-world than I preferred. But once I started playing around with avatar options that are available, it became obvious to me pretty quickly that there's a lot of scope for gender-subversion with avatar-building. The fact that a binary m/f choice is coded into the world's OS is a bit irritating, but once one starts exploring what one can do with one's avatar, it doesn't really seem to limit one's options at all. Still, it'd probably be worthwhile to suggest a neuter basic option as a feature suggestion to Linden Labs, as a matter of principle. If someone hasn't already done that, I'll look into it.

Date: 5 August 2008 04:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nitoda.livejournal.com
They obviously *don't* care about gender identity, just about splitting the world into two neat boxes. Procrustian (sp?) tendencies. :-(

Date: 5 August 2008 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenk.livejournal.com
Identification purposes? Dunno.

Re: Another gender enforcement rant

Date: 5 August 2008 07:40 pm (UTC)
ext_481: origami crane (Default)
From: [identity profile] pir-anha.livejournal.com
yeah, that's stopped me from signing up as well.

Profile

firecat: red panda looking happy (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

May 2013

S M T W T F S
   1 234
5 6789 1011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Style Credit

Style:
[personal profile] branchandroot
Resources:
Secksy Purple
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 24 May 2013 11:06 pm