ext_32787 ([identity profile] beaq.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] firecat 2011-04-22 07:18 am (UTC)

Hrum. Institutionally, isn't science a way of compensating for biases? It's not going to decide what's important and what constitutes "harm", but it's at least a way to record what's happening. Over the long haul. Individually, I think maybe the only thing to do is uh. Yeah. Teach people early on about how interpretive bias and rationalization work?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org