US health insurance craziness pt 23,592
Hospital patient status: observation vs. inpatient
http://magazine.angieslist.com/hospitals/articles/patients-paying-more--under-observation-.aspx
If you're on Medicare, nursing home costs following a hospital stay are covered if you are "admitted" to the hospital, but are not covered if you are in the hospital for "observation."
The first comment on the article, by one Edwin Bradley MD, states "In general the care one receives in 'observation' is not as good as in the fully staffed hospital bed." I wonder if that is true generally.
http://magazine.angieslist.com/hospitals/articles/patients-paying-more--under-observation-.aspx
If you're on Medicare, nursing home costs following a hospital stay are covered if you are "admitted" to the hospital, but are not covered if you are in the hospital for "observation."
The first comment on the article, by one Edwin Bradley MD, states "In general the care one receives in 'observation' is not as good as in the fully staffed hospital bed." I wonder if that is true generally.
no subject
This sounds like a similiar sort of dissonance.
no subject
no subject
15 years ago, I spent 3 days in the hospital for "observation." On the psych ward, yes. I got exactly zero care other than one visit with my shrink, meals and a bed. And I had to ask for keys to the shower just like the "regular" patients. But they all had group therapy, art therapy, individual sessions with their doctors, and so on.
However, I don't think Medicare should discriminate among types of hospital admission when covering any kind of care. It's ridiculous.
no subject
no subject
no subject
OH HAI, here we are observing all the gases and liquids going in and out of this person's body by means of tubes. But we're ONLY OBSERVING!
(I hope you don't mind my being a little silly about what sounds like a horrible experience.)
Linketies (with a lot of online resources for nature-identification)