firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration) ([personal profile] firecat) wrote2024-12-20 07:38 am
Entry tags:

Language change?

Language change note (or new-to-me language usage, anyway)

An article in Knitty had this: “They’re arranged in such a way that one can develop their brioche proficiency by working their way through the designs.“

I’ve never seen the pronoun ”one“ paired with “their“. I’ve always done it like this: “one can develop one’s proficiency…” I like it.
jesse_the_k: Scrabble triple-value badge reading "triple nerd score" (word nerd)

[personal profile] jesse_the_k 2024-12-20 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)

Hmm, I like it too. I know I've said one ... one's many times in the past, aiming for gender-neutrality. But I felt like I was donning a fake Oxonian cap while doing it. The one ... their pair is much more natural for a US English speaker.

So, what does brioche proficiency mean in a textile craft context?

pameladean: (Default)

[personal profile] pameladean 2024-12-20 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
If I recall correctly, the way you (and I) refer back to "one" was standard accepted English, but lots of people just naturally used "they" pronouns to refer back, and got corrected. But now it may, I hope, be considered to be correct to just do that.

P.
starwatcher: Western windmill, clouds in background, trees around base. (Default)

[personal profile] starwatcher 2024-12-21 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
Hmm... I think I've seen it and just shrugged and carried on. With the new acceptance of singular 'they', it makes a lot of sense.