Page Summary
datagoddess.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pameladean - (no subject)
stonebender.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pir-anha.livejournal.com - yay, macro feature!
bobbylevi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nex0s.livejournal.com - (no subject)
therealjae.livejournal.com - (no subject)
epi-lj.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jinian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
chickenwitch.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Base style: Modular by
- Theme: Purple Haze by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags





no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 05:41 am (UTC)I have no clue what any of them are, other than very neat.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 05:48 am (UTC)The first one is absolutely spectacular. It may be wild hyacinth (camissia scilloides), but I'm not sure.
The yellow one looks like an iris. It may be yellow flag. Though I'm not actually sure that that's native. Blue flag is.
P.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 06:14 am (UTC)I believe the gardens weren't required to have 100% native plants, so it could be yellow flag.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 05:23 pm (UTC)Piranha may be right about number 3, but it's blooming here right now and I've seen some odd garden variations. I take back the present-tense affirmation, however, and substitute a conditional.
P.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 07:19 am (UTC)yay, macro feature!
Date: 5 May 2005 07:20 am (UTC)#4 is iris variegata with the ends of the dark patterned leaves eaten off, *heh*. like here: http://www.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/~db50/FOTO_-_Archiv/Iris%20variegata%20BotKA%20G4.jpg.
i don't know that #3 is a pasqueflower -- the wooliness certainly made me think of it too, but it's too late for it, isn't it? it also doesn't quite look right, though that's not a plant i know well -- but in my mind the blossom has its own stem, no protective capsule leaves (whatever the real name is for them), and the leaves are thready. *googles*. like: http://www.photoshutter.com/flower/fl-66l.jpg. that picture rocks! *googles some more*. oh man. you got a lot of woollies: http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/photos/flora/com-W.html -- calphotos is such a great site; i had all forgotten about it.
don't even have a remote clue as to #2. go back when it's beyond budding. :) not that that helped me with #1, mind. it is not a camas (they're native here), but i don't know what it is instead.
Re: yay, macro feature!
Date: 5 May 2005 05:24 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 10:01 am (UTC)and yay macro feature :)
n.
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 11:44 am (UTC)-J
no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 5 May 2005 03:06 pm (UTC)I join the hordes who are crazy for the first one but have no idea what it is.
no subject
Date: 6 May 2005 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 6 May 2005 04:16 am (UTC)