Open Source in Tuttle, OK
2 Apr 2006 11:19 amA follow-up story:
http://www.tuttletimes.com/siteSearch/apstorysection/local_story_088201244.html
The city manager is quoted thus:
http://www.tuttletimes.com/siteSearch/apstorysection/local_story_088201244.html
The city manager is quoted thus:
[CentOS is] a free operating system that this guy gives away, which tells you how much time he's got on his hands.
no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 06:29 pm (UTC)Helpful translation:
"I don't regret being an asshole; that's what prompted an innocent person who was helpful and kind in spite of my unwarranted aggression to do what I wanted."
Gads, but I wish I could do something to express my contempt.
no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 06:36 pm (UTC)And the Mayor seems to be clue resistant, if not actully clue-repellent.......
Halfway to hell
Date: 2 Apr 2006 06:41 pm (UTC)Of course, for all we know Jesus wasn't very good at admitting his own mistakes either.
no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 07:04 pm (UTC)Might've been nice, that when the leadership of your fine burgh is slandering (or libeling, I always get them mixed up) the person who helped your sorry ass out, you try to get both sides of the story.
no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 08:52 pm (UTC)Re: Halfway to hell
Date: 2 Apr 2006 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 08:53 pm (UTC)Re: Halfway to hell
Date: 2 Apr 2006 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Apr 2006 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 01:17 am (UTC)Re: Halfway to hell
Date: 3 Apr 2006 01:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 01:51 pm (UTC)I wonder whether this will increase the number of folks likely to be willing to run CentOS on their system, or decrease that number.
My sense is decrease.
no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 08:39 pm (UTC)"IT IS NOT!" (beat) "Slander is spoken. This is libel."
(One of my all-time favorite movie lines. It was so perfect.)
no subject
Date: 3 Apr 2006 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 Apr 2006 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 Apr 2006 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 4 Apr 2006 11:51 am (UTC)Unless I'm mistaken, the incidence of MBA-types (i.e. non-geeks) making managerial decisions for IT is pretty high. Those are the folks who are going to be a whole lot less likely to choose CentOS if they read about this. IMA&EESHO.
no subject
Date: 4 Apr 2006 03:27 pm (UTC)The MBA types in IT management ususally don't worry about the nuts and bolts decisions; they have a lower-level geek put stuff together. As long as the price is good (and you don't get better pricing than "free"), the MBA types will go on about the rest of their day. IMO.
no subject
Date: 4 Apr 2006 07:01 pm (UTC)MBA-types do indeed have lower-level geeks put stuff together. Proposals. Then they review them. If they associate CentOS with this story in any way, they're going to run screaming.
Thought experiment. Imagine you are not a geek. Imagine that you work with geeks, and manage them. Imagine you read this story, or worse, you read the original email exchange. Who are you going to identify with?
Hint: not Johnny Hughes
no subject
Date: 10 Apr 2006 05:38 pm (UTC)You're right; I should have tried to contact Johnny. I did try, but not really hard. I looked for an e-mail for him, and when I didn't find it quickly, I didn't press it. The main gist of the story was supposed to be how this thing affected the local community, and what it meant to local people, and that's what I went for. I didn't want to get too technical because it needed to be something that my 80 year old subscribers who don't even have a computer could have a chance at understanding. The subscribers were the audience I was aiming for, even though I knew this story would have a larger following.
Another roadblock is the fact that the news team at the Times is just me, and we had several other stories break that week that also needed close attention.
Johnny contacted me after the story ran, and I put his letter in the April 6 issue of the paper. I was glad to have his second viewpoint in the paper, plus it took the issue a little deeper for those readers who wanted to know more.
I know some people online are saying I was biased for the city manager, but to be honest, I thought I was being hard on Jerry by putting his quotes in the article. I think he did too; the link from the city website to the paper has been removed and I haven't heard from him since the interview. Such is life.
no subject
Date: 10 Apr 2006 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 Apr 2006 10:01 pm (UTC)All you needed to do to be "hard" on the city manager was to state the facts of the case, including quoting him directly, as you say. He doesn't sound like he backs down from grudges very easily, so good luck with future newsgathering.