For Miss Manners fans
21 Aug 2006 05:33 pmvia
jenk, a really interesting interview with Judith Martin (aka Miss Manners), in which she discusses the historical origins of American manners:
http://www.neh.gov/news/humanities/2005-01/civility.html
Amusing excerpt:
http://www.neh.gov/news/humanities/2005-01/civility.html
Amusing excerpt:
My column has been running in the Japan Times forever, but I don't get mail from them. I asked once, in Japan, why. They said, well, it would be rude to ask me questions.
no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 03:13 am (UTC)A rather interesting discussion thread on alt.poly recently was comparing Australian and American manners, particularly with respect to such things as tipping and interacting with taxi drivers and so forth. To my eye, such comparisons make it pretty clear that many aspects of American manners are not based on egalitarianism, despite what Ms Martin may have to say about it.
FWIW, I have found some of the most vocal proponents of Ms Martin's writings to have the poorest manners (by my standards) of folk in my extended social circle. I find that interesting.
no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 07:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 07:32 am (UTC)I've never had any problems with your manners, FWIW. I'd much rather hear about your concepts of good manners than those of "Miss Manners" and her more vocal enthusiasts. I have more respect for your concept of courtesy since you actually seem to adhere to it consistently yourself. :-)
no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 08:08 am (UTC)I've talked about Miss Manners on alt.poly but not recently AFAICR.
Miss Manners does use a cleverly snarky tone in her column (for example: "With your lack of success in diagnosing the lady's emotional state, Miss Manners is surprised that you are now making medical pronouncements." Perhaps that's what the folks on alt.poly are imitating. I don't know what that means for whether MM considers it appropriate for other occasions.
Setting aside the snarky tone of her replies, I think her views on manners make a lot of sense. She's very good at using the concept of manners to discourage behavior that I consider boundary-violating.
no subject
Date: 22 Aug 2006 10:15 pm (UTC)I did like the article though. Especially the ending gentlemen have to act like gentlemen to be considered such.
So, then, what are manners *for*??
Date: 23 Aug 2006 06:37 am (UTC)It often boggles my mind that the people who seem most concerned with good manners think nothing of being mean to others - as long as they're witty about it, of course!
As far as I'm concerned, good manners are all about helping social relationships go smoothly, and a big component of that is sparing other people's feelings whenever possible. So when I know that a certain person believes very strongly in being polite, I am always quite taken aback if I discover that that person likes to make nasty comments, or thinks it's funny when somebody else does. This is not just hypocritical, it's downright confusing!
If you want to be a meanie, then don't pretend to be polite. Revel in your rudeness! At least that way, I'll see you coming.