![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
firecathttps://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/facing-challenge-online-harassment
I'm glad they said something.
It's true that rules and regulations aimed at harrassers are likely to end up being used against the same groups of people who are most often the targets of harrassment (women, people of color, queer people, etc.). For example, Facebook's real name policy has been used to harrass drag queens and trans people.
The suggestions they describe for addressing harrassment are important but they aren't sufficient. Stronger blocking tools that are easier for individual users to employ? That matters, but it's not going to help with doxxing. More control over the online availability of personal information? That matters, but it's a really inadequate tool against harrassment per se. It puts a huge burden on the victim and limits their participation in the public sphere. Counter-speech? That is absolutely necessary, but it's not a solution that allows victims to stay online, especially when the victims are individuals who would rather not spend every moment of every day being reminded of their harrassment.
I have a problem with the phrase "The kind of harassment we are worried about happens when Internet users attract the attention of the wrong group or individual," because it's subtly victim-blaming.
Also the post relegates the demographics of harrassment (e.g. that women are harrassed at a far higher rate than men) to a footnote.
I'm glad they said something.
It's true that rules and regulations aimed at harrassers are likely to end up being used against the same groups of people who are most often the targets of harrassment (women, people of color, queer people, etc.). For example, Facebook's real name policy has been used to harrass drag queens and trans people.
The suggestions they describe for addressing harrassment are important but they aren't sufficient. Stronger blocking tools that are easier for individual users to employ? That matters, but it's not going to help with doxxing. More control over the online availability of personal information? That matters, but it's a really inadequate tool against harrassment per se. It puts a huge burden on the victim and limits their participation in the public sphere. Counter-speech? That is absolutely necessary, but it's not a solution that allows victims to stay online, especially when the victims are individuals who would rather not spend every moment of every day being reminded of their harrassment.
I have a problem with the phrase "The kind of harassment we are worried about happens when Internet users attract the attention of the wrong group or individual," because it's subtly victim-blaming.
Also the post relegates the demographics of harrassment (e.g. that women are harrassed at a far higher rate than men) to a footnote.
no subject
Date: 12 Jan 2015 04:06 am (UTC)(I mean, about the footnote/making the details about women and other marginalized people literally in the margins, and, about attracting the wrong people being a bit victim blamey).
no subject
Date: 12 Jan 2015 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 12 Jan 2015 06:39 am (UTC)my main concern was wanting it to be an opener for more discussion and an invitation to the table in some way.
anyway, i liked it in general.