Molly Ivins warns us
9 Jun 2003 09:13 amWhole article here.
Excerpt:
Excerpt:
They have their priorities, and repealing the Fair Labor Standards Act -- in place since the 1930s -- is one of them. In one of those annoying little Republican exercises in cheap misdirection, this particular bill to screw workers is misleadingly titled the Family Time Flexibility Act.
Cute, eh? As though they were doing you a big favor. The only enforcement mechanism in the 40-hour work week is that employers have to pay time-and-a-half if they make you work more than 40 hours. Under this charmer, if you work overtime, your employer can pay you with straight comp time, one hour for one hour, instead of time-and-a-half wages, thus saving the corporations millions. [...]
This son of a gun is a job-killer. If an employer can overwork the people he's got now without paying extra, why would he hire additional employees? It's bad for the economy. This doesn't "give" workers flexibility, it takes away their right to get time-and-a-half.
Re: Hm.
Date: 9 Jun 2003 09:59 am (UTC)Fuck.
That language is so measly. "Reasonable time." "Unduly disrupt."
"Sorry, Jane, you're the only nurse we have on staff here. You can't go home."
Re: Hm.
Date: 9 Jun 2003 11:09 am (UTC)Reading over the language, I think the danger isn't in this particular version, it's in the possibilities of whittling away of the protections down the line. Revisions get a lot less media attention than new laws.So I'm going to tell my legislators that I don't want the 40 hour work week rescinded and I don't want employees to be required to take comp time.