Cut-tag photos poll results
17 Dec 2004 12:47 pmMy poll yesterday about cut-tagging photos produced the following results:
Of those who made a specific selection (not "Other"):
Slightly less than half voted that I should cut-tag all photos.
Slightly more than half voted that I should cut-tag only photos larger than a specific size (about the same number of people voted for each option, 10K, 60K, 100K, or "none").
Of the folks who voted "Other," a number of people wanted wide photos cut-tagged (which I will definitely do, regardless), and several people didn't care if the first photo was cut-tagged but did want additional photos cut-tagged.
Based on these results, I'm inclined to go with the following in my journal:
Of those who made a specific selection (not "Other"):
Slightly less than half voted that I should cut-tag all photos.
Slightly more than half voted that I should cut-tag only photos larger than a specific size (about the same number of people voted for each option, 10K, 60K, 100K, or "none").
Of the folks who voted "Other," a number of people wanted wide photos cut-tagged (which I will definitely do, regardless), and several people didn't care if the first photo was cut-tagged but did want additional photos cut-tagged.
Based on these results, I'm inclined to go with the following in my journal:
- I won't cut-tag one photo that's a reasonable width and 10K or less.
- I will cut-tag all other photos.