17 Dec 2004

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
My poll yesterday about cut-tagging photos produced the following results:

Of those who made a specific selection (not "Other"):

Slightly less than half voted that I should cut-tag all photos.

Slightly more than half voted that I should cut-tag only photos larger than a specific size (about the same number of people voted for each option, 10K, 60K, 100K, or "none").

Of the folks who voted "Other," a number of people wanted wide photos cut-tagged (which I will definitely do, regardless), and several people didn't care if the first photo was cut-tagged but did want additional photos cut-tagged.

Based on these results, I'm inclined to go with the following in my journal:

  • I won't cut-tag one photo that's a reasonable width and 10K or less.
  • I will cut-tag all other photos.
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
My poll yesterday about cut-tagging photos produced the following results:

Of those who made a specific selection (not "Other"):

Slightly less than half voted that I should cut-tag all photos.

Slightly more than half voted that I should cut-tag only photos larger than a specific size (about the same number of people voted for each option, 10K, 60K, 100K, or "none").

Of the folks who voted "Other," a number of people wanted wide photos cut-tagged (which I will definitely do, regardless), and several people didn't care if the first photo was cut-tagged but did want additional photos cut-tagged.

Based on these results, I'm inclined to go with the following in my journal:

  • I won't cut-tag one photo that's a reasonable width and 10K or less.
  • I will cut-tag all other photos.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789101112 13
14151617 181920
21222324252627
282930    

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 24 Sep 2025 10:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios