firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
This is a chart of "average IQ by state" and whether the state supported Bush or Gore. I'm not sure which is more creepy, that there is an "average IQ by state" measure at all, or that it correlates so closely with election returns.

http://americanassembler.com/features/iq_state_averages.htm

Date: 5 May 2004 11:32 am (UTC)
geekchick: (twitch)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
I'm not sure which is more creepy

I vote C.) All of the above. Eep.

Date: 5 May 2004 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cjsmith.livejournal.com
I love partisan reporting, especially when it's so blatantly unashamed.

Date: 5 May 2004 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalmn.livejournal.com
iirc, all of those scores are within a standard deviation of "normal", which means that effectively it doesn't mean anything.

erg. if rivka doesn't come look at this soon, i'll get my dad (stats geek extraordinaire) to explain it and i'll post here, because i seem to be reduced to waving my arms and chirping.

Date: 5 May 2004 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordweaverlynn.livejournal.com
i seem to be reduced to waving my arms and chirping.

I would pay to see that in person.

Date: 5 May 2004 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wild-irises.livejournal.com
Just come to WisCon. I can pretty much guarantee it will happen there.

Date: 5 May 2004 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalikanzara.livejournal.com
Clesest I could find to "smartest state" was http://www.morganquitno.com/edrank03.htm, and in there the ranking moves quite a bit year to year, so I'm also wondering about the numbers, their source, and, as kalmn mentioned, their meaning.

Date: 5 May 2004 12:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
The "intelligence ranking by state" comes from a book which claims that poor countries are poor because the average IQ in that country is lower than in rich countries.

I've not read the book, but I can see a number of ways in which that may be falacious. . .

Date: 5 May 2004 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hobbitbabe.livejournal.com
I agree with [livejournal.com profile] kalmn that the statistics make me want to chirp.

I wonder how they counted and who they counted. Grad students and young professionals, for example, are a fairly transient population, so they might not get counted. On the other hand, they might not register to vote, or might not be eligible to vote because they aren't US citizens.

I think it's weird that the right-wing party is red and the centre one is blue, because in Canada it's the other way around (with the left-of-centre NDP being orange, of course.)

To the extent that IQ measurement instruments are culturally biased, I wonder if a case could be made that they are biased against Republicans?

Date: 5 May 2004 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wild-irises.livejournal.com
I categorically don't believe these measurements, and appreciate the people who have statistical backing for my belief. IQ is such a tainted measurement in the first place ...

I hate it when "my side" are the jerks.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789101112 13
14151617 181920
21222324252627
282930    

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 28 Dec 2025 10:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios