![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Thoughts on reading this post by
jackwilliambell via
supergee; the former post includes a link to this article from USA Today (warning, Firefox told me it tried to give me pop-ups):
"This is the Google side of your brain"
I find it interesting that the USA Today article doesn't make the connection between the usefulness of search engines and the aging of the population. More often than before, words and facts I used to know temporarily go missing. If I'm at my computer, I can look 'em up again.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
"This is the Google side of your brain"
I find it interesting that the USA Today article doesn't make the connection between the usefulness of search engines and the aging of the population. More often than before, words and facts I used to know temporarily go missing. If I'm at my computer, I can look 'em up again.
no subject
Date: 29 Dec 2005 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Dec 2005 01:26 am (UTC)Really, of course, it's not about intelligence at all (except perhaps the sort of intelligence it takes to come up with good search terms), but it is about storage and retrieval. The Internet gives me a vast, constantly growing storage bank, and tools such as Google give me a retrieval system that's sometimes more reliable and easier to use than my own brain.
no subject
Date: 29 Dec 2005 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Dec 2005 05:59 pm (UTC)