![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
firecathow much fish would a feral cat carry if a feral cat could carry fish?
http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/2006/07/feral_cat_carry.html
work safe if work allows you to listen to excitable Japanese TV
http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/2006/07/feral_cat_carry.html
work safe if work allows you to listen to excitable Japanese TV
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 06:16 pm (UTC)Jeeze, I am NOT going to show this to Nanook. It might give him ideas.
no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 06:52 pm (UTC)"How much fish would a feral ferry if a feral could ferry fish?"
I love that video.
no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 07:05 pm (UTC)Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 07:22 pm (UTC)Re: Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 07:24 pm (UTC)Re: Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 08:16 pm (UTC)Re: Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 08:24 pm (UTC)Cat dominance exists but is quite unlike dog and human dominance, from my limited observations of local felines. There seem to be complex rules and habits. For example, my cats will sleep together on the bed during the day, and sleep in separate parts of the bed when the OH and I are sleeping, but in the evening when the OH and I are in bed, before we go to sleep, they will only visit one at a time and take turns. sometimes one leaves if the other arrives, and sometimes one chases the other away - maybe because s/he arrives "too early".
Re: Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 09:06 pm (UTC)Was it you who told me that cats form "associations", not packs? That alone implies a LOT of complexity. It's been fascinating watching Nanook with the cats next door, because there are so many of them (six), and they spend so much time over here.
no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 11:22 pm (UTC)Re: Social question
Date: 10 Jul 2006 11:24 pm (UTC)I don't remember telling you that, but it makes sense based on what I know.
no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 10 Jul 2006 11:54 pm (UTC)It works okay
Date: 18 Jul 2006 05:46 am (UTC)Or at least, that's how I titled it when I passed it on to Casey's folks.
Re: It works okay
Date: 18 Jul 2006 06:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 Jul 2006 05:07 am (UTC)