that privilege meme
31 Dec 2007 12:19 pmSwiped from everybody
Acknowledgment to http://quakerclass.blogspot.com/2007/11/what-privilege-do-you-have.html. The list is based on an exercise developed by Will Barratt, Meagan Cahill, Angie Carlen, Minnette Huck, Drew Lurker, Stacy Ploskonka at Illinois State University.
You know, for me it will be more efficient just to include the items that didn't apply and/or have complicated answers.
* Had more than 500 books in your childhood home
Technically speaking, possibly not—mom was big on getting rid of stuff we weren't using. But I had access to all the books I wanted.
* The people in the media who dress and talk like me are portrayed positively
Insofar as I am white, yes. Insofar as I was/am fat and a geeky dresser, no. And I might argue that women and girls in general were not portrayed positively in the media in the 60s and 70s.
* Had a credit card with your name on it before you turned 18
This trend must have come along after my time. None of my peers did, as far as I know.
* Your parents (or a trust) paid for all of your college costs
I worked in the summers and that paid for a little bit.
* Had a private tutor before you turned 18
I wonder if these came along after my time, too. I mean, I know they existed before, but they seem more common now.
* Your clothing was all bought new before you turned 18
The clothing my mother bought me was bought new. I bought some of my own clothing at thrift stores, but that was my choice, not a necessity.
* Your parents bought you a car that was not a hand-me-down from them
I got hand-me-down cars, but my dad worked at GM and was required to buy a GM car every year. So the hand-me-down cars I had were almost new.
* Had a phone in your room before you turned 18
Parents didn't approve of the idea, I guess. Actually, despite all the time I spent on the phone just like most teenagers, I think it never even occurred to me that I might want a phone in my room.
* Participated in an SAT/ACT prep course
After my time?
* Had your own TV in your room in High School
See the bit about the phone in my room.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised at how many people I see responding with dismay that they score as "highly privileged" on this test, as if that meant there was something wrong with them. It doesn't mean there is something wrong with you. It just means you were given some of your opportunities and resources, and didn't start from zero. It's important to be aware of that.
Acknowledgment to http://quakerclass.blogspot.com/2007/11/what-privilege-do-you-have.html. The list is based on an exercise developed by Will Barratt, Meagan Cahill, Angie Carlen, Minnette Huck, Drew Lurker, Stacy Ploskonka at Illinois State University.
You know, for me it will be more efficient just to include the items that didn't apply and/or have complicated answers.
* Had more than 500 books in your childhood home
Technically speaking, possibly not—mom was big on getting rid of stuff we weren't using. But I had access to all the books I wanted.
* The people in the media who dress and talk like me are portrayed positively
Insofar as I am white, yes. Insofar as I was/am fat and a geeky dresser, no. And I might argue that women and girls in general were not portrayed positively in the media in the 60s and 70s.
* Had a credit card with your name on it before you turned 18
This trend must have come along after my time. None of my peers did, as far as I know.
* Your parents (or a trust) paid for all of your college costs
I worked in the summers and that paid for a little bit.
* Had a private tutor before you turned 18
I wonder if these came along after my time, too. I mean, I know they existed before, but they seem more common now.
* Your clothing was all bought new before you turned 18
The clothing my mother bought me was bought new. I bought some of my own clothing at thrift stores, but that was my choice, not a necessity.
* Your parents bought you a car that was not a hand-me-down from them
I got hand-me-down cars, but my dad worked at GM and was required to buy a GM car every year. So the hand-me-down cars I had were almost new.
* Had a phone in your room before you turned 18
Parents didn't approve of the idea, I guess. Actually, despite all the time I spent on the phone just like most teenagers, I think it never even occurred to me that I might want a phone in my room.
* Participated in an SAT/ACT prep course
After my time?
* Had your own TV in your room in High School
See the bit about the phone in my room.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised at how many people I see responding with dismay that they score as "highly privileged" on this test, as if that meant there was something wrong with them. It doesn't mean there is something wrong with you. It just means you were given some of your opportunities and resources, and didn't start from zero. It's important to be aware of that.
no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:27 pm (UTC)The authors/creators label this as "A Social Class Awareness Experience" and are therefore very up-front with the scope of the information revealed/focused on. I agree that there are more aspects of identity and privilege and oppression that can be illuminated by these things. But I was actually grateful to see one thing tackled at a time.
no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 11:55 pm (UTC)Yes, disability really affects quality of life and opportunities.
no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 09:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 10:17 pm (UTC)Racial privlege is another issue -- it's correlated with class in the United States, but racism and classism are two distinct things here.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 31 Dec 2007 11:57 pm (UTC)I would love to see people add to the list.
If we're talking mainly financial privilege, the list is endless!
From:Re: If we're talking mainly financial privilege, the list is endless!
From:Re: If we're talking mainly financial privilege, the list is endless!
From:Re: If we're talking mainly financial privilege, the list is endless!
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 12:38 am (UTC)I also think I was always aware of my father as a true example of the American dream. He was a Holocaust survivor who came to the U.S. at age 17 with pretty much nothing and worked his way up to be an assistant director of a municipal government agency. Whatever privilege I did / do have derived from the hard work of somebody who had none.
no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 12:44 am (UTC)What difference do you think it makes in your privilege if you came by it because your parent(s) worked hard vs. if you came by it because you were born into a family that already had lots of assets?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 01:40 pm (UTC)Surely this is true of everyone, depending on how many generations back you want to go?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 04:32 am (UTC)My accent is seen as the norm and/or educated.
My parent/s expected me to go to college.
My parent/s read parenting books even if they didn't necessarily apply the theories in said parenting books.
I had two or more parental figures actively involved in my life i.e I was not raised by a single parent, so parent and stepparent count or two co-parents living separately but I shuttled between both or I had other family figures in my life.
My parent/s took me on activities that were designed to educate me or enrich my life regardless of the cost - by this metric trips to the library would count.
My parent/s helped me with school work.
My parent/s had white collar profession/s. (I know several software engineers who never finished college)
One parent stayed at home to look after me or took time off work to spend time with me. (This is a privilege of particular kinds of jobs, but not others)
My parent/s told me I was intelligent and taught me things outside of school.
no subject
Date: 1 Jan 2008 05:33 am (UTC)On the distinction between upper/upper-middle class and nouveaux-riche - I'm not sure how old you are, but I think the personal phone has trickled way down to many people by now, since phones are much less expensive now than they were when I was growing up, and many kids have cell phones in case of emergency.
I think the credit card companies started setting up on campus a few years after my time, offering students cards in their own names secured by their parents. So I don't think that's nouveaux riche any more either.
A new (not hand-me-down and not used) car might still be.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Being expected to go to college
Date: 3 Jan 2008 12:54 am (UTC)If both of my parents had had my mother's background and attitude, this probably wouldn't have been the case. She didn't go to college and never had a professional career. (She was mostly a homemaker, but after my parents' divorce, she held blue-collar jobs.) My father was mainly the one who pressured/encouraged me to "do something" with my life. When I dropped out of college after one year and then worked in factories and clerical office jobs, he called me a "failure".
But oddly, he himself didn't go to college, and he didn't have a professional job. Unless being a sales representative is considered professional? I don't know how to categorize it. He went to department stores and talked to purchasing agents, trying to get them to buy the stuff his employer sold. It turned out he was exceptionally talented at this and made lots of money. Our economic class changed a lot while I was in high school.
But also, I think the education thing is as much cultural as class-related. My father was Jewish, my mother was not. Jews, including working-class Jews, value education very highly. So I'm not surprised that my dad expected us to go to college.
GM new car purchase
Date: 2 Jan 2008 12:35 am (UTC)seriously? wow, that is ... weird. was this a demand for all employees or only those at a certain level? did GM financially compensate their employees for it in some way?
Re: GM new car purchase
Date: 2 Jan 2008 12:43 am (UTC)He was loaned a free company car that changed every three months. He could choose any model (can't remember if it was any GM model or any Chevrolet model).
He had to buy a car at cost once a year. He could sell that car for retail value if he chose, so it was theoretically possible to make a profit on it.
Re: GM new car purchase
From:Re: GM new car purchase
From:no subject
Date: 2 Jan 2008 02:50 am (UTC)If you have anything other than a TV accent (I've heard the TV accent comes from the Great Basin), you aren't portrayed positively (with some exceptions for New York accents). Southern accents are universally condemned by the media, which also doesn't look kindly on Northern Plains or Boston working class.
Furthermore, you could be really rich and really educated, but dress shabbily or eccentrically, which wouldn't play well in the media.
no subject
Date: 2 Jan 2008 04:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2 Jan 2008 08:32 pm (UTC)My partner Richard is upper middle class (UK variant thereof, which implies that his family were as comfortable and well-educated as possible without actually being born into a title). He speaks to other people with the kind of "posh" British accent that makes many Americans swoon. (That is not the same accent/tone of voice that he uses to speak to his friends, and it's interesting to hear his voice change depending on who's at the other end of the phone.) He also has long hair and a beard, and dresses mostly in black.
People who speak the way he does are portrayed positively, on the whole. (There may be some degree of jealousy towards them for coming from privilege.) People who look the way he does are treated like idiots or scumbags. Never mind that he is a geek, and prefers comfortable clothes, and doesn't want to have to deal with whether or not his clothes match each other in the morning. (Black goes with everything.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2008 12:33 am (UTC)I have always found that people who dress and act (I don't know about talking) the way I do are portrayed as kooky radical nutcase types. Every time I identify with a TV character because of how they look, they end up being some eco-terrorist, flaky occultist, or other hippy-dippy weirdo type. I don't know if this has anything to do with class, but I answered the question in a very literal way. I don't feel like people who look like me (in their style, not body type) are portrayed positively at all in the media. I'm sure this has much more to do with marginalizing people who don't have mainstream ideas than anything else, but it bugs me.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2008 08:53 pm (UTC)I'm pretty sure the word "deserve" is lurking here somewhere.
no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2008 09:37 pm (UTC)I agree with you that privileges are still privileges even if the parents didn't have some of them and worked to provide them.
The person who said that people whose families have been rich/powerful for generations are less likely to understand that they are privileged. That might be true.
I don't think that changes what a person "should" do (by my ethical system), though. I think anyone with privilege, however or whenever they acquired it, "should" understand how the system gives them things they didn't earn. It doesn't matter how long their families had the privilege before they had it. I also think they "should" use their extra resources to help distribute power and opportunities more fairly.
But I don't expect other people to share my ethics.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:More on class in the USA
Date: 4 Jan 2008 10:15 pm (UTC)Here's a graphic about class in American from the NY Times. See where you (or your family) scores!
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/national/20050515_CLASS_GRAPHIC/index_01.html
It requires Flash.