firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
via [livejournal.com profile] klwalton, an article called "Why Marriages Fail" (http://www.shrinktalk.net/archives/why_marriages_fail_1.phtml) contains the following quote:
couples that don't ever fight eventually don't have sex either. Why? They are both forms of passion. If you give up one form of intensity you'll ultimately leave the other as well.
Is this true in your experience?

Comments screened; I will unscreen yours if you give me permission to do so.

Date: 3 Apr 2009 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jillzilla.livejournal.com
(unscreen if you like)

A couple of people have already said similar things, but there's no harm in redundancy. In my experience, "not fighting" can mean that there's nothing the lovers disagree about at the moment or it can mean that one or both of them is so conflict-averse they will do just about anything to avoid difficult discussions for fear there might be anger or other scary feelings involved. But avoiding difficult or risky discussions (if there is something that needs to be discussed) means disengaging from one's partner, and that distance is likely to take the passion out of everything, including sex.

However, since my love-relationship life has been a long bumpy series of failures, growing more dismal as the years go on, I doubt that my opinion is valuable on this subject.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 16 Jan 2026 07:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios