Date: 20 May 2010 08:25 am (UTC)
zeborah: Map of New Zealand with a zebra salient (Default)
From: [personal profile] zeborah
I'm honestly failing to see the point of that. It can't possibly keep him warm. It's surely not the height of fashion. It looks downright uncomfortable, and yet... Well, if it were ropes or chains or maybe leather I could get into that. Oif it were black or even sequin-bedecked, I could at least get it -- possibly even cotton white. But Superman-blue spandex?

Why?

Date: 20 May 2010 09:38 am (UTC)
branewurms: (Mushishi - what)
From: [personal profile] branewurms
......I just... why would you ever.

re: Ouch!

Date: 20 May 2010 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] betonica
**EEeeeeWWWwww.**

I mean, sure, why not, if you like it - just not to my taste.
(really, that's what I meant. really)

Date: 20 May 2010 02:14 pm (UTC)
boxofdelights: (Default)
From: [personal profile] boxofdelights
Shyeeeah. I mean.... What's it for? I'd find it terribly tempting to tug it away from his body and then let it snap back, but other than that, what could it be for?

Date: 20 May 2010 03:57 pm (UTC)
urocyon: Grey fox crossing a stream (Default)
From: [personal profile] urocyon
I'd seen those before (not IRL, thank goodness!), and am still wondering what they're for. That's got to be uncomfortable, and it's hard to imagine anyone finding them attractive. Different strokes, and all that, I suppose. :-|

Date: 21 May 2010 08:45 am (UTC)
amadi: A bouquet of dark purple roses (Default)
From: [personal profile] amadi
This is definitely fashion over form. I have to imagine that sitting down or bending over is impossible unless one enjoys wedgies -- which I do not deny as a possibility, of course, YKINMK, YKIOK -- I have a feeling that like a wide swath of lingerie for femme folx, it's not meant to be worn for longer than it takes to adequately scintillate and arouse one's partner of choice.

Date: 21 May 2010 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] amethystfirefly
I... have no idea why anyone would even think of wearing that. D:

Date: 21 May 2010 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] amethystfirefly
Neither do I. But I never did. -laughs-

Date: 20 May 2010 08:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] e4q.livejournal.com
not safe for EYES!

Date: 20 May 2010 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epi-lj.livejournal.com
That looks uncomfortable.

Date: 20 May 2010 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com
I've always thought thongs looked uncomfortable, no matter how sleek the person is who wears them.

Date: 20 May 2010 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdodragoncat.livejournal.com
What an...odd garment.

Date: 20 May 2010 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starcat-jewel.livejournal.com
I see that men's fashion is finally catching up!

Date: 20 May 2010 08:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carpe-embreem.livejournal.com
OUCH is appropriate commentary! How interesting. I don't know what to think about this.

Date: 21 May 2010 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] men-in-full.livejournal.com
Buttfloss!

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 25 Jan 2026 03:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios