firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
Kee Hinckley on Google+ (public, so visible to people who aren't members) discusses the real difference between social networks where real names are required and those where names are up to the individuals.

https://plus.google.com/117903011098040166012/posts/Ax8tyxVMa5w

Excerpt (emphasis mine):
When you create a social networking site that requires real names, you create an artificial bubble. What you see is just the nice things in people's lives, you don't see what's really happening. But when people have control over who knows their name, they still talk about cute cats and the latest iPhone and what kind of wine they drank last night, but they also talk about other things. They talk about dealing with their parent's Alzheimer's. They talk about how their daughter was missing for three days and got drugged and raped and the police refused to follow up. They talk about how they just lost their job and they're worried that they'll end up on the street. They talk about how their boss will fire them if he finds out they're gay. They talk about how they were sexually abused as a kid. They talk about what it's like to live in a country where bloggers get thrown in prison. People don't dare talk about those things with their birth names; not when Google is indexing everything they say.
...
The sad thing is, if you're dealing with something difficult in your life, that bubble also makes you think you're alone. You think you're the only one, because nobody else is talking about how they're going to pay for their parents nursing care, or how hard it is to juggle work and family.
This is quite true in my experience. I see a lot more of people's real lives on DW and LJ than on Facebook.

A commenter on the original post disagreed and said that it's fine for you to not use your real name on G+, you just have to use an ordinary sounding name, not what he called a "fantasy name." This isn't true as far as I can ascertain, but it makes me want to play a game with G+ where thousands of us all join under the same ordinary sounding name ("John Smith," if we use the typical ordinary sounding name of my culture).

re: The real name artificial reality bubble

Date: 16 Aug 2011 04:08 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] betonica
Excellent points. I like the part you've got bolded, up there. Makes it clear how the name policy really, really affects all of us who participate.

I'm over there under my real name (I always was on usenet, and I am on facebook, too) but I've been contemplating attempting to open an account as the Blonde Ice Bitch From Hell (or some other alternate personality) just to see what happens. Being quieter about it and calling myself John Smith might be a good idea, too.

I'm still thinking this through. I agree entirely that G+'s current policy is ultra-bad. I'm hoping some sort of revolution will happen to change it, but I'm also not holding my breath.

Waiting game. And if it seems like there's something I can do that will actually make a difference, I'll do that. Someone suggested getting the media involved: getting mainstream America to see G+ as doing something bad might just have an impact on them. So that's another thought, but I don't know that I've got the energy to go that route.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 22 Jan 2026 04:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios