The aesthetics of names
17 Aug 2011 04:25 pmThis is a post by Mike Elgan on G+ titled "The trouble with Google's names policies: Real unconventional names = Bad. Fake 'normal' names = OK."
https://plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/XtkGjGsBA3V
The post itself is not what I want to talk about though. It's a comment in that thread by Robert Scoble, a big Google+ booster who has recently been going back and forth about what he thinks of Google's name policy.
If Scoble were to say "I want to use my name, and I don't want to feel pressured to come up with a handle," I would understand it. He says he doesn't like Second Life because he wanted to use his name there, and I also don't like Second Life's policy of requiring you to use a name they pick for you (you get to enter your own "first name" but you have to choose from their list of "last names"). But to think that "I really like seeing names that look common" is a good basis for a policy? Or to even think that it's worth uttering in public? I don't get it.
https://plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/XtkGjGsBA3V
The post itself is not what I want to talk about though. It's a comment in that thread by Robert Scoble, a big Google+ booster who has recently been going back and forth about what he thinks of Google's name policy.
...some people have "non common" names and I do have empathy for those who really have weird names, like M3 (if that's really his legal name).I can scarcely put into words the rage I feel about the notion that people's names are an "aesthetic" issue reasonably subject to control. It's racist, sexist, classist, xenophobic, and just about every other -ist and -phobic I can think of.
But that said I am totally groking the AESTHETIC that Google is going for. They are trying to look different than Twitter is and I really really like seeing names that look common here. IE, most everyone I've met in the real world has a first and last name.
If Scoble were to say "I want to use my name, and I don't want to feel pressured to come up with a handle," I would understand it. He says he doesn't like Second Life because he wanted to use his name there, and I also don't like Second Life's policy of requiring you to use a name they pick for you (you get to enter your own "first name" but you have to choose from their list of "last names"). But to think that "I really like seeing names that look common" is a good basis for a policy? Or to even think that it's worth uttering in public? I don't get it.
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 07:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 04:13 pm (UTC)Huh.
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 05:34 pm (UTC)When we got outlaw-married, we both took Lastname because we thought we were going to have kids, and we wanted everyone in the family to have the same last name.
But then we decided not to have kids, and we decided we would use Lastname socially, but not enact a legal name change to Lastname, because (A) wanted to be mononymic.
So (A) changed his name legally to (A). And my legal name is still (B Oldlastname).
But we published our book under A Lastname and B Lastname.
So I wonder what Google+ would think my "real name" is.
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 06:53 pm (UTC)I'm confused as to whether there's an Oldlastname that I never knew, or if there's a new Lastname that I didn't hear about.
I think it's the former.
Anyway, not like I really care what they are, because I'm just as happy with you being
A and B, and B's nom-de-LJ-etc.
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 06:55 pm (UTC)(Not by anyone at Google.)
@.@
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 08:58 pm (UTC)*headdesk*
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Aug 2011 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 08:39 am (UTC)Sir Rupert Iain Kay Moncreiffe of that Ilk (also quondam Unicorn Pursuivant)
Okay, I do not think G+ is aiming at the British Peerage and Baronetage, with its complex naming practices (and let's not go into the even more complex European practices).
But there are, at least here in UK, perfectly real people with hyphenated names on their governmet-issued documentation (did I see that G+ is counting hyphens as a symbol and thus no-no?)
And the not inconsiderable number of people with three names? (including a significant number of authors). What happens to them?
This guy has lived in a really small bubble and doesn't get out much, obviously.
no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Aug 2011 12:36 pm (UTC)