The aesthetics of names
17 Aug 2011 04:25 pmThis is a post by Mike Elgan on G+ titled "The trouble with Google's names policies: Real unconventional names = Bad. Fake 'normal' names = OK."
https://plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/XtkGjGsBA3V
The post itself is not what I want to talk about though. It's a comment in that thread by Robert Scoble, a big Google+ booster who has recently been going back and forth about what he thinks of Google's name policy.
If Scoble were to say "I want to use my name, and I don't want to feel pressured to come up with a handle," I would understand it. He says he doesn't like Second Life because he wanted to use his name there, and I also don't like Second Life's policy of requiring you to use a name they pick for you (you get to enter your own "first name" but you have to choose from their list of "last names"). But to think that "I really like seeing names that look common" is a good basis for a policy? Or to even think that it's worth uttering in public? I don't get it.
https://plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/XtkGjGsBA3V
The post itself is not what I want to talk about though. It's a comment in that thread by Robert Scoble, a big Google+ booster who has recently been going back and forth about what he thinks of Google's name policy.
...some people have "non common" names and I do have empathy for those who really have weird names, like M3 (if that's really his legal name).I can scarcely put into words the rage I feel about the notion that people's names are an "aesthetic" issue reasonably subject to control. It's racist, sexist, classist, xenophobic, and just about every other -ist and -phobic I can think of.
But that said I am totally groking the AESTHETIC that Google is going for. They are trying to look different than Twitter is and I really really like seeing names that look common here. IE, most everyone I've met in the real world has a first and last name.
If Scoble were to say "I want to use my name, and I don't want to feel pressured to come up with a handle," I would understand it. He says he doesn't like Second Life because he wanted to use his name there, and I also don't like Second Life's policy of requiring you to use a name they pick for you (you get to enter your own "first name" but you have to choose from their list of "last names"). But to think that "I really like seeing names that look common" is a good basis for a policy? Or to even think that it's worth uttering in public? I don't get it.
no subject
Date: 20 Aug 2011 09:03 pm (UTC)I use my legal name online. Despite being quite open about this and extremely easy to google, I still get accused, regularly, of being a sock of someone with a more common frances/francesca/etc. spelling. (And I don't disagree: My name does look an awful lot like one common style of pseudonym creation.) The vast majority of middle class, white, Western European names that fall into a Firstname Lastname system still look "weird" to a lot of people whose own names fall into that system. On top of the racism and unwarranted prejudice against letting people choose their own names, this silly view of aesthetics simply doesn't apply to the real world--even the parts he's probably thinking of.
no subject
Date: 21 Aug 2011 12:08 am (UTC)