Class signaling via Apple products
18 Apr 2012 12:42 pm"A Macbook Pro is just as much of a status marker as a Louis Vuitton purse or a BMW."
I recoil at the notion because I think Vuitton purses and BMWs signal a different class than ones I identify with. (At least I tend to have prejudices about people who have those things—I'll assume "not like me" unless I get evidence to the contrary.) But I do think that, in California at least, there's a class I might call "hi-tech professionals" and having Mac products can signal identification with it.
FWIW, I think I'm kind of clueless about class.
Anyway, it's interesting to contemplate. What do you think?
I recoil at the notion because I think Vuitton purses and BMWs signal a different class than ones I identify with. (At least I tend to have prejudices about people who have those things—I'll assume "not like me" unless I get evidence to the contrary.) But I do think that, in California at least, there's a class I might call "hi-tech professionals" and having Mac products can signal identification with it.
FWIW, I think I'm kind of clueless about class.
Anyway, it's interesting to contemplate. What do you think?
no subject
Date: 19 Apr 2012 02:01 am (UTC)Use Donald Trump as a yardstick...
I feel weirdly like I'm defending the existence of high-end luxury goods.
Most high-end luxury goods don't interest me, but if someone got upset because they exist, I suppose I would "defend" them too. I would point out that people have always made and desired fine things. Until fairly recently, only the very, very wealthy had any access to luxury goods. These days they are available to a much larger segment of the population. If no one is harmed in the making or consumption of the things, I don't see a problem.
no subject
Date: 19 Apr 2012 02:40 am (UTC)Good point.
no subject
Date: 19 Apr 2012 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 19 Apr 2012 06:29 pm (UTC)True. Some of the debt is in service of maintaining a lifestyle suitable to one's profession or the class one aspires to.