no subject
22 May 2020 01:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
firecatToday's great thread on ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fictional_fans discusses what counts as horror:
https://fictional-fans.dreamwidth.org/62889.html
My comment (very rambly and poorly written):
There are many different kinds of horror. I think some are fun and some are "huh?" and some are "no way am I going there."
For example one of my "huh?" types is certain kinds of body horror. I remember reading a Simon R Green story where at one point a house turns all squishy and mucusy, and I'm like "why is this horrific?" Maybe I have cleaned too many cat cages at the animal shelter, but body productions don't really horrify me. But Simon R Green does other kinds of horror that work for me (e.g., characters that the protagonist has to deal with to achieve a goal, but they are dangerous and unpredictable).
One thing that distinguishes horror from other fiction for me is that a world that feels chaotic and semi-inexplicable feels horrific in a way that, say, science fiction or fantasy where there are understandable rules for how the world works does not.
I'm especially noticing this now, because I've stopped being able to read horror (sorry, N. K. Jemisin's new series), and I think it's because the world feels too chaotic to me right now.
The "chaotic and semi-inexplicable" definition might explain why some typical horror tropes done in certain ways don't read as horror to me. For example, Mira Grant's Feed doesn't, because although zombies are a horror trope, her world makes a lot of sense. People know how the zombies work, how the infection is passed on. If the plot turns on "we know how things work, but we run out of resources to deal with them," that's not horror to me, it's something else.
Anyway, this all works out to my not being able to rely on a genre label to tell whether I'll react to something as horror or as something else.
fictional_fans discusses what counts as horror:https://fictional-fans.dreamwidth.org/62889.html
My comment (very rambly and poorly written):
There are many different kinds of horror. I think some are fun and some are "huh?" and some are "no way am I going there."
For example one of my "huh?" types is certain kinds of body horror. I remember reading a Simon R Green story where at one point a house turns all squishy and mucusy, and I'm like "why is this horrific?" Maybe I have cleaned too many cat cages at the animal shelter, but body productions don't really horrify me. But Simon R Green does other kinds of horror that work for me (e.g., characters that the protagonist has to deal with to achieve a goal, but they are dangerous and unpredictable).
One thing that distinguishes horror from other fiction for me is that a world that feels chaotic and semi-inexplicable feels horrific in a way that, say, science fiction or fantasy where there are understandable rules for how the world works does not.
I'm especially noticing this now, because I've stopped being able to read horror (sorry, N. K. Jemisin's new series), and I think it's because the world feels too chaotic to me right now.
The "chaotic and semi-inexplicable" definition might explain why some typical horror tropes done in certain ways don't read as horror to me. For example, Mira Grant's Feed doesn't, because although zombies are a horror trope, her world makes a lot of sense. People know how the zombies work, how the infection is passed on. If the plot turns on "we know how things work, but we run out of resources to deal with them," that's not horror to me, it's something else.
Anyway, this all works out to my not being able to rely on a genre label to tell whether I'll react to something as horror or as something else.
no subject
Date: 23 May 2020 02:57 am (UTC)Good distinctions among the various uses of the zombie trope.