5 Sep 2024 05:10 am
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
The Nanowrimo peeps shouldn’t have referenced ableism, classism, and privilege in their recent post about AI.

But I don’t understand why a person would be categorically opposed to all uses of whatever-is-being-called-AI-this month in a creative pursuit.

(The majority of my use of AI has been getting suggestions for cat names, so that tells you how much you should pay for this opinion.)

There are ways to use AI, for example as a prompt or name generator, that are not “getting it to write your whole novel.” Why would someone object to such uses?

The Nanowrimo posts everyone is piling on already say that using AI to do the actual writing misses the point.
It’s a problem for creators that so far no copyright law covers what AIs can consume, but that’s a separate issue from whether they have legitimate uses.

I seem to be at variance with most of my opinion bubble about this issue. Feel free to tell me what I’m missing.

Context: https://www.404media.co/email/3d9698b2-8c2b-41e7-bea4-7a1ac6916159/

Date: 7 Sep 2024 10:10 am (UTC)
minoanmiss: A detail of the Ladies in Blue fresco (Default)
From: [personal profile] minoanmiss

Hmm. In which layer of writing do you work on character voice? I know from happy experience you're excellent at it.

Another thing AI fiction can't deliver, from what I've seen, is distinct character voice. This is one of the hardest and most rewarding parts of writing for me because how we say things influences what gets said and what doesn't, so I have to start with it in my first draft. I don't think I could go back and weave it into an AI-written first draft.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Page Summary

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 26 Jan 2026 06:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios