Huh?

24 Jun 2003 10:11 pm
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
OK, so how come the result of the Presidential Candidate Selector came out "Libertarian candidate 100%" when I checked the following:

  • There should be a guaranteed livable annual income for all, including those outside the work force.
  • Federal funding of welfare and assistance to unemployed and under-employed individuals and families should be increased
  • Support a universal health care program to guarantee coverage to all Americans regardless of income.
  • Regarding the positions of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, my ideal candidate will generally share the positions of the NAACP

Re: Huh?

Date: 24 Jun 2003 11:53 pm (UTC)
ext_481: origami crane (Default)
From: [identity profile] pir-anha.livejournal.com
that's strange indeed. i gave the same answers as you on those items, and i ended up with kucinich, dean, sharpton (*aie* on the sharpton). i would have been very surprised if i had ended up with the libertarian party candidate on top -- as it was, zie was down under 50%, though not as low as shrub (who was third from the bottom).

Re: Huh?

Date: 25 Jun 2003 12:02 am (UTC)
rosefox: Me with raised eyebrow, skeptical and mischievous. (wiseass)
From: [personal profile] rosefox
Al Sharpton is such a great candidate, even Republicans support him!

Re: Huh?

Date: 25 Jun 2003 04:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supergee.livejournal.com
I scored fairly high on Sharpton, perhaps because they did not have a question like "Must Not Have a Perm"

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 17 Jan 2026 07:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios