Musings of an apathetic pinko libertarian

[firecat]

I tend to think that any *concept* -- including "mental illness" -- exists mainly in the mind of the society that created it and teaches it to its members. From that point of view, I can see a society that says that mental illness doesn't exist.

What can't be gotten away from, whether one believes in the concept of mental illness or not, is that there are a lot of suffering people in the world. Some of those people are suffering because their mental/emotional workings make it very difficult for them to succeed in their society. Sure, one might put it another way: their society is terribly narrowminded and only allows a narrow range of behaviors to lead to success -- far narrower than the full range of human behavior.

An ultimate solution would be to create a society that is able to fulfill the needs and wants of all people without any people being mistreated.

But I think to approach the ultimate solution is going to take decades, if not centuries, and is going to take the talents of some very particular kinds of people. Not everyone in this society is capable of being a culture-changer, a revolutionary, or even a political educator of the kind that will be needed to achieve that society.

In the meantime, there are people suffering. Sometimes they need to choose to reduce their suffering. Sometimes those choices end up not challenging the exploitative classes/industries, or even helping them.

I don't think individuals should be negatively judged by others for making such choices.

I do prefer it when people are educated on the potential negative results of their choices. That means I make an effort to express my opinions about such results sometimes, and I like it when people are willing to listen to and think about such opinions.

I also prefer it when people are willing to take into account the potential negative increase in societal ills when they make their choices. But I don't think those negatives should be the *only* criteria they use.

(Slight tangent) I'm not Jewish but I have always been interested in interpretations ofJewish law and how some Jewish law incorporates exceptions for unusual situations. For example, my understanding is that the law says that you shouldn't work on the Sabbath, but if your cow falls into a ditch on the Sabbath, it's OK to drag it out even though normally that would be considered work. Also, someone once told me that the law says you shouldn't eat or drink on Yom Kippur, but it also says that if fasting makes you very sick, you *should* eat or drink. (Not just that you can, but that you are obligated, as part of the law, to avoid fasting if it makes you very sick.)

That's got something to do with how, intellectually, I approach the issue of individual choices that end up contributing to overall societal oppression, corporate profit, and so on. Avoid it if you can, but you also have an obligation to your own wholeness.

Emotionally, I am sometimes upset when I hear about certain individual choices. For example, I am upset when I hear about women getting cosmetic surgery. I know that in some careers having a surgically altered body is all but a requirement, but it bothers me. I know that some people would rather risk a lifetime of ill health than be fat and they get their stomachs stapled. I am upset about that too.

I'm personally not terribly upset by people who take antidepressants or seek other institutional help because they feel very unhappy with life. But I can see how that might upset some people for the same sorts of reasons I'm upset by body alterations for the sake of conforming.

Comments

[xp85goblin.livejournal.com]

Well, a lot of the girls who have been heavily operated on have had a lot of the texture ironed out of them. But then, that is probably the result of poor aesthetic choices on thier part or that of the doctor than a fault of the technology. I am sure that a savvy patient can make choices that don't make them look like the "assembly line blonde", but then most people don't have an artists sensibility or a leaning toward understatement.

Believe it or not, violent computer games bother me. I am not sure I could turn pro as a game designer and not have my ethics botherered by it. But then, a lot of people will take the easy way and deal with thier problems in a non-constructive way (drinking, drugs, TV, violent computer games, or even working long hours to avoid dealing with the challenges of relationships and family life) than in constructive ways. Perhaps dealing with one's problems head on can be taught....but it requries sufficient people who DO deal with thier problems to be the teachers.

If you have been reading the posts of the past few days, you will know that I have been wrestling with my own superficialities. My superficialities might be different from yours (HBB with attractive partners, recreation involving airplanes and motorcycles, lots of cool art programs), but I don't call them any less materialistic and superficial than the guy who wants something more conventional. But then, if you didn't have superficialities, there would be no room in one's moral universe for anyone other than saints and those with nothing. And given that a lot of those with nothing would have something if given half a chance, they are probably suspect as well. Superficialities allow one to relate to the rest of humanity without finding oneself so unbelievably superior that you are a complete pain in the arse. So I would suggest not worrying TOO much about them, just don't give them top priority or everything they ask for.

[firecat]

I think you're on to something when you point out that it is probably possible to have plastic surgery that doesn't make you look like a clone. I don't mind some forms of body modification and maybe that's part of the reason why.

What bothers me (and I'm not saying no one should do it, just that it *bothers* me) is when one all but has to go under the knife to engage in one's chosen career.

It also bothers me that doctors are required to go through a residency that involves 72 hour shifts. The ability to survive 72 hour shifts is not related to the ability to diagnose and treat someone using Western medicine.

[xp85goblin.livejournal.com]

Well, those that require it are usually "people pleasing" professions (sales, acting, working in a strip club) An IT professional can look like hell and no one thinks too much of it. Most professions above the McDonald's level have some part of it that is unreasonable.
Although I agree with you about interns. The thought of some sleep deprived intern operating on me after I am pulled out of a car wreck gives me the willies.