firecat: child's foot in adult's red high heeled shoe (nostalgia)
[personal profile] firecat
Apropos of a couple of discussions on [livejournal.com profile] wiscon lately I want to express the following, which I posted in alt.polyamory in a thread about said discussions:
Every time I try to describe my feelings about children it boils down to "Um...they are people." As with adults, I have all sorts of superficial thoughts about the ones I don't know - positive, neutral, suspicious, whatever, depending on my mood and their behavior in the moment - and I tend to like the ones I know, especially if they take an interest in me.
Also, I think that hate speech directed at any people is ugly.

For the record, I don't have or want children of my own.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
I've seen lots of what I would call hate speech in the crazier corners of the childfree communities. Crotchfruit, moos, breeders, etc. This is THE reason I am so, so, so not going to reach out for community in those places. And that bums me out, because PRotFU and I have recently come to the realization that we cannot/won't be having kids, and I want to find support and community. Here on lj, I have to say that [livejournal.com profile] cf_marriage is pretty sane and hate speech free. It's also fairly quiet.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
All of that said, my own vitriol tends to rise to the surface in reaction to the parents (mostly mothers) who act as though the fact that they have children (and especially babies) entitles them to just about anything it might occur to them to want. My seat on an airplane is only the most recent instance of this boundless mommy entitlement. And our culture feeds this, with all of our obsession with safety and trampling on civil liberties for the sake of the chilllllldren.

So yeah, it can start to feel like a culture war sometimes. Which is one of the reasons I moved out of the suburbs. Kids are people; they are not angels and they are not aristocracy and neither are their parents. They're people.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
True. Do you not perceive a cultural bias toward entitling mothers and children, though?

Date: 2 Jun 2007 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalmn.livejournal.com
um. i don't.

i'm looking at becoming a single mother, and i'm just not noticing the good childcare easily available, the paid leaves from work for mothers, fathers, adoptive parents, or the overflowing community resources to help with a kid.

i am noticing parking spaces for pregnant women, though. which is aggravating.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
We're coming from fairly radically different worldviews on this. I wonder whether [livejournal.com profile] firecat's journal might not be the best place to hash it out. I'm happy to move this to my journal if you'd like to continue the conversation.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 05:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com
One of the Kaiser clinics took out four handicapped parking spots to put in pregnant women spots. It's pretty annoying because if they really have that much trouble walking in the parking garage, they're probably eligible for a temporary handicapped parking tag and could use a handicapped spot. If they don't have that much trouble, they should park with the other able-bodied folk.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
Ah. I've spent the past four years in a suburban environment where all community pretty much centers around the raising of children. I am surrounded constantly by mothers and children, and their expectations.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starcat-jewel.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] childfree_zone is also a sane group, and it's fairly active. Instead of spending all our time talking about other people's children, our main topics of conversation tend to be:
1) information/support about sterilization;
2) dealing with pronatalist pressure from friends and family; and
3) noting and discussing mentions of childfree people, or CF in general, in the media.

The hate groups like to call us "fluffy-bunny", but that's their problem.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 04:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmd.livejournal.com
Hey thanks!

Date: 2 Jun 2007 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnpalmer.livejournal.com
You know, it's scary, because there are parts to the pagan community that seem to be the exact same way (and use the exact same term).

And it always makes me wonder, do they realize it sounds like they're saying there's something wrong with people who don't have hate (or anger, or what-have-you) as a major motive force in their lives.

(I feel obligated to mention that there are also pagan folks who think of "fluffy bunny" folks as those who don't study seriously, feel they can grab anything that makes them feel good from any tradition, regardless of accuracy, and who have no discipline. I think this is a bit better, but it still seems unduly judgmental.)

Date: 2 Jun 2007 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
You're right, the intended use of the term is the latter, but it gets used as well for people who try to be peacemakers (for example). I think the "dark forces" might be part of the key.

I've always had a lighter view of the universe, so I'm more on the side of the fluffy-bunny-from-their-perspective anyway, I suppose.

(I don't think there are dark forces in the universe; I think that it can be a useful way to think about things. "If you go into the wilderness, you might want to think about the dark spirit of the wild wanting to kill you, because otherwise you might do something not-smart-enough (as opposed to "something stupid") and end up dead.")

Kind of a digression, I suppose... but I'm tired this morning. (Well, "afternoon", now.)

Date: 2 Jun 2007 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnpalmer.livejournal.com
You're right, the intended use of the term is the latter, but it gets used as well for people who try to be peacemakers (for example). I think the "dark forces" might be part of the key.

I've always had a lighter view of the universe, so I'm more on the side of the fluffy-bunny-from-their-perspective anyway, I suppose.

(I don't think there are dark forces in the universe; I think that it can be a useful way to think about things. "If you go into the wilderness, you might want to think about the dark spirit of the wild wanting to kill you, because otherwise you might do something not-smart-enough (as opposed to "something stupid") and end up dead.")

Kind of a digression, I suppose... but I'm tired this morning. (Well, "afternoon", now.)

Date: 2 Jun 2007 05:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com
I saw a bumpersticker a couple of weeks ago that said:

If you can't feed 'em
Don't breed 'em

Now, clearly I couldn't stop his pickup truck to argue with the driver, but I wanted to.

I've known since I was 13 that I didn't want kids, but I think it's fine for most people to have them. I generally like the kids I know personally.

Date: 2 Jun 2007 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjlayman.livejournal.com
Yeah, I was thinking mostly about the income. Things can be going fine and then dad gets hurt on the job. What does the pickup guy want them to do? Kill a couple of kids?

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 27 Jan 2026 03:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios