firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
[personal profile] firecat
[livejournal.com profile] wordweaverlynn has an interesting discussion going about relationship promises. I made these comments:

I've never been legally married, because if I want to make legal agreements with a person, I want to write them myself, not get the government's package deal that they might change at any time.

But I did have an Outlaw Wedding with my OH. We didn't make absolute promises about the future, because neither of us is comfortable with that. We talked about what we want, what our relationship is like, and what we do in the present to maintain the relationship as one that we will continue to want.

With the OH and also my other committed partners, my main hope (not a promise but an intention) is that we stay in each other's lives for as long as we both live. My main promise to them is that I will talk about conflicts that arise and try to resolve them. I promise that in specific because my tendency is to drift off if there is conflict, rather than talking about it.

I'm finding it hard to answer "what kind of promise would you want from your partner(s)." The way it seems to work for me, in order to interact with someone in a certain way and to hold them in a certain position in my life, I need for both of us to be doing certain things (to show caring and affection regularly, to respect, and to follow through on most agreements we make). If those things don't happen, then the relationship doesn't hold its position.

But I don't want promises to do those things, because promises don't substitute for the actions, and because I don't want someone to do those things if they don't mean them but are only doing it because they promised at some point in the past. I want someone to do those things because that's important to them in the present.

Date: 29 Aug 2007 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] innerdoggie.livejournal.com
I really agree with what you say here: "promises don't substitute for the actions, and because I don't want someone to do those things if they don't mean them but are only doing it because they promised at some point in the past. I want someone to do those things because that's important to them in the present."

One of my main fears about marriage (or other committed relationships) is to have a partner who is motivated by duty. They don't love me, they don't even like me, but they made a promise and by gum, they will stick with it! They'll be very proud of their sexual fidelity and think it makes up for the long faces, heaving sighs, grumpiness and outright contempt. And I won't be able to leave because they aren't abusive or a cheater, and the contempt has worn me down so much I can't move.

I think I would appreciate somebody who came through with practical help in a crisis (schlepping me to the doctor if I were seriously ill), even if they were only doing it from duty. But I wouldn't want a whole marriage like that!

Date: 29 Aug 2007 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wild-irises.livejournal.com
As so often, you are bang in the center of something important. "Promises do not substitute for actions." I think that one thing promises are, for me, is a guideline for actions. In a complicated world, we have to make choices and set priorities: if I have promised a person something, then that's a priority-setting guideline. And yes, in the final analysis, the actions are what matters.

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
456789 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 Jan 2026 05:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios