![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This code (swiped from
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
<poll name='' isanon='no' whovote='all' whoview='all'> <poll-question type='radio'> +1? <poll-item>+1</poll-item> </poll-question> </poll>
Or you can add a "like" instead.
<poll name='' isanon='no' whovote='all' whoview='all'> <poll-question type='radio'> Like? <poll-item>+1</poll-item> </poll-question> </poll>
Or a range of options.
<poll name='' isanon='no' whovote='all' whoview='all'> <poll-question type='check'> Eh? <poll-item>Like</poll-item> <poll-item>+1</poll-item> <poll-item>Tickybox!</poll-item> </poll-question> </poll>
If you don't want to deal with copying and pasting the code, you can use the Poll Creator.
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 9
Eh?
no subject
So now I'm thinking *waves smoke out of ears* if I could modify this to use DW's native (or any non-native) thumbs-up image in place of the +1, and how to force the whole thing into the bottom meta bar so it displays automatically with every post (would require an s2/Perl solution). Huh. Thank you for sharing this!
no subject
no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 02:45 am (UTC)To expand upon this (Dreamwidth-specific) I'd much rather click a +1 button or a thumbs-up or an "I read this" ticky box or similar than:
1) Click the reply link to a top-level entry
1a) if logged in, get the quickerreply form with its title field and comment form to fill in
1b) if logged out, wait on the next page with full-size comment form to load with its title field and comment form to fill in
2) fill in at least one of the fields or forms (comment text can't be empty, so the comment form often wins when one's in a hurry)
2a) if you need more options on quickerreply, click the More Options link, then wait for the full-size comment form to load
3) click Submit, wait for the posted comment to load
3a) if the poster's screening comments, wait anywhere from minutes to days for the comment to be unscreened by the poster
4) reply to anyone who replies to your comment or at least look over what they said
As compared to:
1) tick the ticky box or click the thumbs-up; done
It'd be nice to just mark ourselves "present", is I guess what I'm trying to say, without all the rigmarole comment replies can involve.
no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 03:07 am (UTC)So I've learned to build that sort of non-reaction reaction into some of my (mostly access-locked) writing or I wouldn't be able to keep doing those kinds of posts because they get so little to no visible feedback. But. On the other hand.
I know a certain core viewership *is* reading them (or at least reading most of them, or at least reading most of each one of them). And I feel for people I do this to, so I want a tool that lets them say, "I've been here" or "*waves* Hey, I read this" without actually having to find those (or any) words - because when you add in how long it can take to express them via our commenting system, I can see how it might be too much simply because people have their own lives, too.
So.
no subject
Date: 2 Feb 2019 10:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Feb 2019 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 1 Feb 2019 10:33 pm (UTC)