Notes from the Field
24 Sep 2003 02:37 amDan Savage writes:
The true measure of a man's love isn't that he doesn't desire others, PC, but that he doesn't act on his desire for others.Euuuugh.
no subject
Date: 24 Sep 2003 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Sep 2003 06:02 am (UTC)What always low-level annoys me when the subject came up is the implicit suggestion that women don't look--in this column, in the suggestion that if you don't want a partner who looks then you should date a woman (dog, or blind person). It's not surprising that DS should not be well acquainted with women as part of a sexual relationship, but I tire of feeling tarred with the same brush as those who freak out because their male partner looks.
waitaminnit
Date: 24 Sep 2003 06:33 am (UTC)i mean, i'm thinking here of my own history, and some of what i've witnessed with poly friends.
a man who promises to slow down partner-adding and *sticks to that promise* is not acting on his desire for others. he's demonstrating his love for his other partners by keeping his promise.
it's not the only measure of love, but it certainly can be a measure of honesty, and commitment, which can be an expression of love.
n.
Re: waitaminnit
Date: 24 Sep 2003 09:16 am (UTC)If I were to rewrite the original quote in such a way that it made sense to me, it would probably be closer something like, "The true measure of a man's love isn't that he doesn't desire others, but that he doesn't act on that desire against his current partner['s|s'] wishes."
Re: waitaminnit
Date: 24 Sep 2003 09:46 am (UTC)Re: waitaminnit
Date: 24 Sep 2003 09:57 am (UTC)Re: waitaminnit
Date: 24 Sep 2003 10:00 am (UTC)I also don't think it's "the true measure" of love.
no subject
Date: 24 Sep 2003 08:28 am (UTC)