firecat: blue bubble background with text "white privilege: you're soaking in it" (white privilege)
[personal profile] firecat
[livejournal.com profile] bcholmes cut-tags an excellent post (go read it!) with the text ( My Privilege Looks Like This: I've Been Staying Silent in the Conversation ). That's what mine looks like too and that's what I am doing for the most part. I will talk about it if anyone asks me to, but so far I don't have anything to say that vito-excalibur and sparkymonster and badgerbag didn't say better.

Date: 22 Jan 2009 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] innerdoggie.livejournal.com
I'm both sympathetic and unsympathetic to the notion of "cultural appropriation". There seem to be two issues -- who is a legitimate member of a group and a legitimate user of a tradition, and second, what counts as a real tradition. Perhaps there is a third issue: are you using that tradition in the right manner, but maybe that's really a part of issue #2 -- is this really a tradition?

For Native Americans, it's pretty complicated about who counts as Native American. Different groups have different notions of tribal membership (matrilineal descent only, family on the Dawes rolls, do descendants of slaves count? what about people adopted into the tribe?)

Many people (especially white people and black people) have family legends about descent from a certain tribe. If somebody like that decides to practice a tradition, are they legitimate only if the family legend is true, and cultural appropriators if the legend is false? Or are they only legitimate when the tribe decides they are? Who makes those decisions?

What counts as a tradition? Because of loss of language and ways of life, traditions may be lost. People attempt to rediscover these traditions, but may be inventing new ones. What about when Native Americans meet up at pan-tribal gatherings and share traditions? You are Ojibweh and and decide to carve totem poles -- is that "cultural appropriation?"

If the tradition is newly minted and may actually have its origin in New Age religion rather than traditional tradition, is it "cultural appropriation" for outsiders to adopt it? I think the answer here may be "yes", but there's something about it that makes me uncomfortable.

Date: 22 Jan 2009 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] innerdoggie.livejournal.com
I think "cultural appropriation" is most clear when a religious object gets re-purposed by people outside the religion. If the object isn't religious, then it seems less clear that there would be offense. If I take a horseshoe and use it for a paper weight, that doesn't seem as bad as if I take the Host and use it for a cheese cracker.

(Here I am making a distinction between "religious" and "not religious" that might not be valid in a particular culture.) More things to mull over.

Is this mostly an issue for artists more than just the average schmoe?

Profile

firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
firecat (attention machine in need of calibration)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 5 Feb 2026 09:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios