bcholmes cut-tags an excellent post (go read it!) with the text ( My Privilege Looks Like This: I've Been Staying Silent in the Conversation ). That's what mine looks like too and that's what I am doing for the most part. I will talk about it if anyone asks me to, but so far I don't have anything to say that vito-excalibur and sparkymonster and badgerbag didn't say better.
Those things are true. And I think there are no clear cut answers to those questions. And that means there's no way to say "This is bad appropriation and that isn't, end of discussion.
But there might be opinion trends that emerge in conversation.
I think the issues are "how do we have conversations about this?" and "If we care about whether our art has things to say to people from cultures other than our own, how do we learn what it says to them?" and "How do we incorporate elements from other cultures more respectfully and accurately"?
I think that people who are making art that is about or that borrows from cultures/traditions/ethnic groups/etc. that aren't their own, or might not be their own, do well to listen to what people who identify more closely with those cultures/traditions/ethnic groups have to say about the art.
I also think that people who are members of privileged groups bear a greater responsibility to do this, because in general members of privileged groups are less likely to know detailed stuff about the cultures of other people, simply because they don't encounter them as often, and they are less likely to have experience learning how to navigate in more than one cultural milieu.
I think "cultural appropriation" is most clear when a religious object gets re-purposed by people outside the religion. If the object isn't religious, then it seems less clear that there would be offense. If I take a horseshoe and use it for a paper weight, that doesn't seem as bad as if I take the Host and use it for a cheese cracker.
(Here I am making a distinction between "religious" and "not religious" that might not be valid in a particular culture.) More things to mull over.
Is this mostly an issue for artists more than just the average schmoe?
This particular discussion has mostly to do with white people using of non-white/non-European cultures and characters in their fiction, and whether they made enough of an effort to be sensitive and respectful.
I have also seen discussions around using another culture's traditional mode of dress (e.g., white Americans wearing saris or kimonos).
no subject
Date: 22 Jan 2009 09:10 pm (UTC)But there might be opinion trends that emerge in conversation.
I think the issues are "how do we have conversations about this?" and "If we care about whether our art has things to say to people from cultures other than our own, how do we learn what it says to them?" and "How do we incorporate elements from other cultures more respectfully and accurately"?
I think that people who are making art that is about or that borrows from cultures/traditions/ethnic groups/etc. that aren't their own, or might not be their own, do well to listen to what people who identify more closely with those cultures/traditions/ethnic groups have to say about the art.
I also think that people who are members of privileged groups bear a greater responsibility to do this, because in general members of privileged groups are less likely to know detailed stuff about the cultures of other people, simply because they don't encounter them as often, and they are less likely to have experience learning how to navigate in more than one cultural milieu.
no subject
Date: 22 Jan 2009 09:52 pm (UTC)(Here I am making a distinction between "religious" and "not religious" that might not be valid in a particular culture.) More things to mull over.
Is this mostly an issue for artists more than just the average schmoe?
no subject
Date: 22 Jan 2009 11:34 pm (UTC)I have also seen discussions around using another culture's traditional mode of dress (e.g., white Americans wearing saris or kimonos).